Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Accepted Article
Background
Honey contains a variety of polyphenols and represents a good source of
antioxidants. On the other hand, human diet often contains compounds that cause
DNA damage. In the present study we investigated the protective effect of three
commercial honey samples of different floral origin (rosemary, heather and
heterofloral) from Madrid Autonomic Community (Spain) as well as of an
artificial honey on DNA damage induced by dietary mutagens, using a human
hepatoma cell line (HepG2) as in vitro model system and evaluated by the
alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis or comet assay.
Results
Rosemary, heather and heterofloral honey protected against DNA strand
breaks induced by N-nitrosopirrolydine (NPYR), benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and
2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). However, none of the
honey samples tested prevented DNA strand breaks induced by
N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Heterofloral and heather (unifloral) honey
samples with the higher phenolic content were the most effective to protect HepG2
cells against DNA damage-induced by food mutagens. Heterofloral honey was the
most efficient to protect HepG2 cells against DNA damage induced by NPYR and
BaP, while, heather honey was more protective towards PhIP. Artificial honey
did not show protective effect against DNA damage induced by food mutagens
tested, indicating that the protective effects of honeys could not be due to
their sugar components.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that the protective effect of three kinds of Spanish
honeys from different floral origin could be attributed in part to the phenolic
content present in the samples. Honeys with the higher phenolic content,
heather and heterofloral, were the most effective to protect towards food
mutagens-induced DNA damage in HepG2 cells. In addition, a possible synergistic
effect between other minor honey components could be also involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment